Archive for April, 2010

Videos from Idea Camp: Exponential 2010 (Orlando)

Thursday, April 29th, 2010

The following is a list of topics and speakers:

* Culture Making and the Local Church with Mark Batterson & Matt Chandler
* Diversity and Church Planting with Efrem Smith, Mark DeYmaz, & Janet McMahon
* Creating Movements & Networks with Dave Gibbons
* Being Present with the City with Alan Hirsch, Shane Claiborne, & Neil Cole
* Compassionate Justice: Ideation to Implementation with Dave Ferguson & Armando Fullwood

Here is the Hirsch, Claiborne, and Cole video:

The Ideacamp at Exponential 2010 with Shane Claireborne, Neil Cole and Alan Hirsch from The Idea Camp on Vimeo.


Watch the videos here.

Links Worth Your Time: Best in Biblical/Theological Studies

Sunday, April 25th, 2010

The Ivy Bush has published an excellent overview of the work of theologian Thomas Oden.

Jesus, Paul, and the People of God: A Theological Dialogue with N. T. Wright. These are lectures (mp3, mp4, flash video) by N. T. Wright, Richard Hays, Marianne Meye Thompson, Kevin Vanhoozer, and others.

Eddie Arthur has two strong posts: “Is It Time to Stop Sending Missionaries from the West?” and “Bible Translation and Culture Change”

Speaking Schedule Update

Saturday, April 24th, 2010

The following dates are now confirmed:

June 7 “A Missional Reading of Genesis 1-3″ Status (Orlando, FL) 7 PM

June 14 - July 26 (Mondays except 7/5) “Praying the Psalter for a Missional Church” First United Methodist Church - Winter Park 7 - 8:30 PM (dinner available from 6 -7 PM)

July 3-5 District Conference Silver Lake Camp (Ontario, Ca) More details soon.

July 4 Centennial Road Church (Lyn, Ontario)

July 11 “Expanding our Borders: Sermon on Ps 82 and Luke 10:” Coronado United Methodist Church 9:30 AM and 11:00 AM

Sept 22-24 Catapult Conference (Mobile, Alabama)

Evangelicals, Genesis and Modern Science: Some Curious Dismissals

Saturday, April 17th, 2010

Bruce Waltke, prominent and well respected OT scholar, was recently forced to resign from Reformed Theological Seminary’s Oviedo Florida campus for comments about evolution under the title “Why the Church Must Come to Accept Evolution: An Update“. Waltke’s dismissal made it onto the ABC News.

Tremper Longman likewise lost his position at a reformed institution over comments about the historicity of Genesis 3. Watch the video here.

In response to these dismissals, Michael Bird, an Australian OT scholar, has written a provocative essay “The End of Reformed Evangelical Reformed Scholars.” He is critical of these moves and wonders what the future holds for evangelical biblical scholars in North America (at least those in Reformed institutions).

Back in 1989, Clark Pinnock penned an intriguing essay “Climbing Out of a Swamp: The Evangelical Struggle to Understand the Creation Texts.” Check it out here. He attempted to point a way forward through the polemics.

Interesting days in which to serve as a biblical scholar.

What is the relationship between science and hermeneutics?
What are the implications of this conversation for reaching modern people with the Gospel?

Jesus: The Game Changer (Luke 20:27-38)

Thursday, April 15th, 2010

27 Some of the Sadducees, who say there is no resurrection, came to Jesus with a question. 28 “Teacher,” they said, “Moses wrote for us that if a man’s brother dies and leaves a wife but no children, the man must marry the widow and have children for his brother. 29 Now there were seven brothers. The first one married a woman and died childless. 30 The second 31 and then the third married her, and in the same way the seven died, leaving no children. 32 Finally, the woman died too. 33 Now then, at the resurrection whose wife will she be, since the seven were married to her?”
34 Jesus replied, “The people of this age marry and are given in marriage. 35 But those who are considered worthy of taking part in that age and in the resurrection from the dead will neither marry nor be given in marriage, 36 and they can no longer die; for they are like the angels. They are God’s children, since they are children of the resurrection. 37 But in the account of the bush, even Moses showed that the dead rise, for he calls the Lord ‘the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.’ 38 He is not the God of the dead, but of the living, for to him all are alive.”

Jesus is a mysterious and profound figure in the Gospels. His teaching continually calls his hearers to make paradigm shifts in their lives. Jesus’ instructions are anti-intuitive, counter cultural, and offer a decisive challenge to the status quo. Just when we are tempted to think that we have figured Jesus out, he explodes the box that we have put around him and challenges us to a deeper life.

Jesus is like a late-comer to a local fishing tournament held many years ago. All of the big name locals are present, and they are competing neck and neck for the prize. Each person has his or her secret bait, and the most successful have modern bass boats, high-end fish finders, and the best rods and reels available. By the time that the late-comer enters the fray it looks as though he is hopelessly behind. Those who are watching the tournament shrug their shoulders as the late-comer calmly puts his canoe into the water and pushes off. Some even begin to laugh when they realize that he does not even have a fishing pole. Yet the mysterious entry calmly rows out into the river and moves into an area unoccupied by other fishing boats. Then as the clock ticks down to the finish, he opens up a bag that he carried with him. To everyone’s surprise he pulls out a half-stick of dynamite. He lights it and tosses it overboard. A few moments later there is a geyser of water near the point of entry. The late comer then rows to the spot and begins to collect the fish that have now floated to the surface because they were stunned by the detonation. After the closing bell is rung, he paddles to shore and his load of fish is triple that of his next closest competitor and sets a new tournament record. There are shouts of protest, but it is found that this technique was not against the rules. It was simply a game changer. In our text for today, Jesus likewise challenges foundational assumptions about the nature and meaning of resurrection.

Jesus is confronted by a group of Sadducees who attempt to trip him up with a question related to marriage and the resurrection. On the surface, Jesus’ conversation with the Sadducees may seem non-confrontational, but Luke 20 records several challenges that Jesus receives from the religious leaders of his day. Moreover, the Sadducees as a group were well known for their denial of the resurrection. This was a point of contrast between the Sadducees and Pharisees. In other words, the very fact that the Sadducees ask Jesus about life in the resurrection suggests that there is an agenda behind their question other than mere interest.

They offer Jesus a scenario in which a woman ends up married to seven brothers each of which dies and is replaced by the next brother in faithful fulfillment of the levirate marriage law from the Old Testament. This law obligated a brother to marry his sister-in-law in the event that his brother died before producing children. The firstborn child of the new union would then be considered the offspring of the deceased brother. The Sadducees then ask Jesus, “In the resurrection, therefore, whose wife will the woman be? For the seven had married her.”

Our Worthiness of Resurrection Life
The Sadducees must have believed that they had handed Jesus an unsolvable Gordian knot. For the Sadducees, the very idea of the necessity of Levirate marriage was proof that there was no resurrection. For them, a person lived on only through his or her offspring so Levirate marriage provided a means of a childless male to have offspring “from the grave.” But as Jesus often did, he adroitly side-stepped his way out of the apparent trap and used the question as an opportunity explode the status quo assumptions of the Sadducees and to point all within ear shot to the deeper reality of God’s kingdom. In other words, Jesus demonstrates the irrelevancy of the Sadducee’s scenario and pushes them to confront the truth about God’s kingdom and the resurrection.

Jesus transforms the conversation away from the question of marriage and focuses on the paradigm shift that occurs between this age and the coming age of God’s kingdom. Some have taken Jesus’ answer as proof that marriage relationships are not part of the afterlife. This however is not the intended teaching of the passage. Rather Jesus focuses on the profound contrast between an existence focused solely on one’s current life and one that is shaped by the future life of the resurrection. Notice that Jesus uses the language of “those who belong to this age” and “those who are considered worthy of a place in that age and in the resurrection” (italics added).

Through his use of the language of worthy, Jesus invites all of his hearers including us to ask ourselves, “What makes a person worthy of life in God’s coming future of resurrection?” Jesus does not directly answer this question for us in this context, but if we have been careful readers of Luke’s Gospel, there have been several recurring themes that serve as markers to this life.

Whereas Jesus offered several scathing rebukes of life in this age as “faithless and perverse” , Jesus’ stories consistently portray a different mode of existence for those who will embody the way of Jesus. In Jesus’ teaching in Luke’s Gospel, we encounter exhortations to eat and associate with “sinners” for sake of extending God’s grace to them. We discover that we are to live by an expanded definition of love for neighbor and recognize that our sworn enemies may in fact embody this ethic better than we. We are exhorted to love others and show mercy extravagantly and indiscriminately. In short, the way of Jesus turns cultural assumptions upside down and overturns tendencies to exclude from access to God those on the peripheries and margins of society.

Jesus’ use of worthy was a subtle critique of the exclusivity of the Sadducees who were drawn primarily from the upper classes of society and who were ultimately the persons most invested in the status quo because they had the most at stake in the world as it currently operated. Their primary interest was in maintaining their own privileged position in society.

The initial part of Jesus’ response is clear: the Resurrection is real and each of us needs to be ready to enter into to it. It is not about marrying and being given in marriage – it is about being a child of the resurrection.

Interpreting Scripture
But Jesus is not finished. He pushes the envelope with the Sadducees by citing Moses. The Sadducees prided themselves on their conservative approach to Scripture. They believed a doctrine only if it was rooted in the text, and for the Sadducees, only the Law of Moses, Genesis – Deuteronomy was recognized as authoritative Scripture for life. Their rejection of the resurrection was based in their insistence that Moses had written nothing about resurrection. Yet in verses 37-38, Jesus introduces the conversation between God and Moses at the burning bush on Mount Sinai as proof that Moses believed in the resurrection. Jesus paraphrases Exodus 3:8 “I am the God of your father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.” By speaking of his relationship in the present tense, Jesus suggests that God’s words imply an on-going, beyond the grave relationship between God and Israel’s ancestors.

Jesus’ words are bold and daring. He has challenged the Sadducees on their misunderstanding of the nature of resurrection and invited them to reflect on the character of their own lives. Now he clearly suggests that they do not even understand their own Scriptures!

The Game Changer
This text is subversive and deeply unsettling. As we reflect on our lives today, do not we find ourselves occupied primarily by the “busy-ness” of the world in which we live? Are not our lives more about “marrying and being given in marriage” than about learning to reflect, cultivate, and embody the sort of existence that bears witness to the reality of resurrection? Moreover our communities of faith and our homes overflow with copies of the Bible. We hear the Scriptures read and proclaimed from our pulpits. We pour over texts in daily devotional times. We engage the Bible in our conversations with one another. This text challenges us to consider the real possibility that we may be misreading the Scriptures as a means of squelching the new work that God is seeking to do in our midst.

Jesus was a game changer. His life, death, and resurrection have changed everything. Are we willing to realign continually ourselves and our communities in order to reflect the game-changing life that God offers to those who follow Jesus?

Resurrection and Mission: Reading Luke 24:44-49

Friday, April 9th, 2010

Vv. 44-49 contains the meat of Luke 24. It ties up several of the recurring elements noted in our reflection on the previous verses. It serves as a basis for a missional hermeneutic.

44 Then he said to them, “These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you– that everything written about me in the law of Moses, the prophets, and the psalms must be fulfilled.” 45 Then he opened their minds to understand the scriptures, 46 and he said to them, “Thus it is written, that the Messiah is to suffer and to rise from the dead on the third day, 47 and that repentance and forgiveness of sins is to be proclaimed in his name to all nations, beginning from Jerusalem. 48 You are witnesses of these things. 49 And see, I am sending upon you what my Father promised; so stay here in the city until you have been clothed with power from on high.”

1) Jesus’ suffering, death, and resurrection was God’s Plan all along. In verse 44 Jesus reminds the disciples of his message before his death. This is crucial. Beginning in Luke 9 following Peter’s confession, Jesus had consistently spoken about his impending death: The Son of Man must suffer many things, and be rejected by the elders, chief priests and teachers of the law, and he must be killed, and on the third day be raised to life (9:22, cf. 9:44, 12:50, 17:25, 18:31-33 etc). This is important for apologetic reasons. It is not a matter of Christians reinterpreting the Bible in order to explain the death of Jesus. Instead, Jesus himself understood the Old Testament to predict the sort of life and death that he lives as well as his resurrection. What happened to Jesus was not haphazard. It was God’s plan all along to which Jesus the Incarnate Word and Son willingly submitted.

2) The Message of the Scriptures Points to Jesus the Messiah as the Climax of God’s Mission. In verses 45- 47, Jesus (re)teaches the Scriptures to his disciples. I like the phrasing of this passage, “He opened their minds to the Scriptures” He showed them the way to read the Scriptures in a manner consistent with the mission of God in Jesus the Messiah. Notice the points that he emphasized:

a) Suffering Messiah (v. 46)
b) Resurrection on Third Day (v. 46)
c) Proclamation to All Nations of Repentance for the Forgiveness of Sins (v. 47)
Verse 47 is key. It links the necessity of proclamation to the nations with the saving acts of the Messiah. In other words, the mission of the Church is the natural response to the mission of the Messiah. So much so that the Scriptures, says Jesus, foresaw this worldwide proclamation. Christopher Wright has stated that the Church does a much better job of reading the Bible messianically than it does reading it missionally. When we talk about a starting place for talking about missional hermeneutics, this is a good one. Missional hermeneutics is a way of reading Scripture that takes seriously the missional heart of God and his creational intentions for humanity to live as a missional community that reflects/embodies God’s character to/for/in the World.

3) Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection sends the Church forth in mission.

Jesus opens the disciples minds to the Scriptures. Unlike too much of our teaching and preaching today that merely transfer information, Jesus ends his teaching with a commission:

The language here is more emphatic that our English translations are able to convey.

1) YOU are witnesses. Disciples move from frightened and demoralized people to serving God’s vanguard. Jesus emphasizes the missional role in which each disciple will serve. This makes explicit what has been implicit throughout Luke 24-an encounter with the Risen Jesus unleashes believers into the world as witnesses. Mission is the reason for the existence of God’s people in the post-Resurrection era. Notice now that the Christ-following movement as God’s people becomes a “go to” group rather than a “come and see/experience” group.

Notice the scope of the sending: all nations. Jerusalem represents the starting point. The world is in view.

How large is my understanding of mission?

2) Witness is empowered by Holy Spirit. God’s missional movement is Spirit-drenched. This is so important that Jesus emphatically orders the disciples to wait for the filling of the Spirit. The emphasis on the work of the Spirit is a good reminder that ultimately the fulfillment of God’s mission is the work of the Spirit through us. We are not called to be super men or women. We are called to be Spirit-filled, sent out humans. The work of God in the world is about power. This power comes only through the Spirit.

© 2007 Brian D. Russell (revised 2009 & 2010)