Posts Tagged ‘Brian D. Russell’

Playing Our Role

Tuesday, January 18th, 2011

Too often we can find ourselves shaped more by the stories of the World than by the story of Redemption as unfolded in the Scriptures. Our age is one of increasing ignorance of the biblical message. This means that followers of Jesus have to be intentional in (re)teaching the Scriptures. But the teaching must move beyond simply a recitation of biblical facts as though knowledge of Scripture could be equated with preparation for Jeopardy or some other quiz show. Instead, a missional reading of the Scriptures is committed to helping women and men to understand and find their place in the grand narrative that God is writing from Creation to New Creation. A missional reading fosters transformational learning for a life of following Jesus faithfully on mission. Moreover a missional reading seeks to make evident the manifold ways in which each part of the Scriptures seeks to convert its reader/hearer to its perspective. The goal of such a life is to unleash transformed people not merely to make a difference in the world but to share in God’s work of crafting a different world.

God’s people are to live as a missional community that serves by reflecting and embodying the character of God to/for/in the world. The triad of mission, holiness, and community serves as compass points for continual (re)alignment with God’s intentions for the world and humanity as revealed in the Biblical witness.

How well are we playing our part?
God is looking for women and men who are willing to step into the role for which they were created. Church planter and consultant Alex McManus uses the metaphor of clue to capture the essence of our lives as Jesus’ followers. In his thinking, each of us serves as a clue to the meaning of life. As persons created in God’s image, we exist to point others to God. We are clues to the mysteries of the universe. When we serve the function imagined for us in the Scriptures, we live as the people whom God created us to be. When others encounter enough “clues,” the clues lead them to God. The goal of a missional reading of Scripture is conversion. Followers of Jesus must be converted continually by the message of the text so that they may (re)align with God’s work in the world. The goal of this realignment is the expansion of the Jesus’ following community in the world. We realign continually so that God can deploy us fully to carry the message of realignment to others.

Catapult Conference (Mobile, Ala): Sept 22-24

Friday, September 10th, 2010

I am looking forward to participating in the Catapult Conference in a a couple of weeks. There is a great lineup of speakers: Alan and Deb Hirsch, Michael Slaughter, Reggie McNeal plus a wide variety of Breakout Sessions. I am looking forward for the opportunity to meet some of these authors, thinkers, and practitioners from whom I’ve already learned much.

I have been asked to teach about missional hermeneutics. This is exciting. I have focused my recent research, writing, and teaching on a missional approach to reading the Bible (see my essay “What is a Missional Hermeneutic?“). I’ve never considered this an academic exercise. Instead, I have worked to help pastors and other Christ followers to read Scripture through the lens of mission because I believe that this approach to Scripture arises out of a close reading of the Bible itself and is absolutely necessary for our post-Christendom contexts in the Western world.

As such I will be making three different presentations at Catupult:
1) A Bible Study on Matt 4:17-22. Introducing a missional hermeneutic as a call to (re)align continually with God.

2) Breakout Session: “Reading Scripture in the Mission Field”
What does it mean to read Scripture in light of our 21st century post-Christian context? How do we interpret the Bible in ways that both unleashed God’s people to live missionally in the world and at the same time invite preChristians to join the Christ-following movement? Brian will teach a practical session that will introduce a missional approach to engaging both the Church and the World with the message of the Old and New Testaments.

3) Plenary Session: (re)Aligning with God: Reading Scripture for the Church and the World

Here is the full schedule for Catapult

I hope that some of you can join us for this event. Registration remains open.

Upcoming Speaking Engagments

Monday, June 21st, 2010

I will be speaking several times this week:

Tonight (6/21) I am continuing my six week series at Winter Park First United Methodist Church (6/14, 6/21, 6/28, 7/12, 7/19, 7/26). The study meets from 7 PM to 8:30 PM. They offer dinner at 6 PM (reservations needed).

6/22 Preaching on Ps 73 at the University of Central Florida Wesley Foundation. 7 PM

6/27 Preaching at Oviedo First United Methodist Church in the morning services: 8, 9:30, 11 AM

Speaking Schedule Update

Saturday, April 24th, 2010

The following dates are now confirmed:

June 7 “A Missional Reading of Genesis 1-3″ Status (Orlando, FL) 7 PM

June 14 - July 26 (Mondays except 7/5) “Praying the Psalter for a Missional Church” First United Methodist Church - Winter Park 7 - 8:30 PM (dinner available from 6 -7 PM)

July 3-5 District Conference Silver Lake Camp (Ontario, Ca) More details soon.

July 4 Centennial Road Church (Lyn, Ontario)

July 11 “Expanding our Borders: Sermon on Ps 82 and Luke 10:” Coronado United Methodist Church 9:30 AM and 11:00 AM

Sept 22-24 Catapult Conference (Mobile, Alabama)

Jesus: The Game Changer (Luke 20:27-38)

Thursday, April 15th, 2010

27 Some of the Sadducees, who say there is no resurrection, came to Jesus with a question. 28 “Teacher,” they said, “Moses wrote for us that if a man’s brother dies and leaves a wife but no children, the man must marry the widow and have children for his brother. 29 Now there were seven brothers. The first one married a woman and died childless. 30 The second 31 and then the third married her, and in the same way the seven died, leaving no children. 32 Finally, the woman died too. 33 Now then, at the resurrection whose wife will she be, since the seven were married to her?”
34 Jesus replied, “The people of this age marry and are given in marriage. 35 But those who are considered worthy of taking part in that age and in the resurrection from the dead will neither marry nor be given in marriage, 36 and they can no longer die; for they are like the angels. They are God’s children, since they are children of the resurrection. 37 But in the account of the bush, even Moses showed that the dead rise, for he calls the Lord ‘the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.’ 38 He is not the God of the dead, but of the living, for to him all are alive.”

Jesus is a mysterious and profound figure in the Gospels. His teaching continually calls his hearers to make paradigm shifts in their lives. Jesus’ instructions are anti-intuitive, counter cultural, and offer a decisive challenge to the status quo. Just when we are tempted to think that we have figured Jesus out, he explodes the box that we have put around him and challenges us to a deeper life.

Jesus is like a late-comer to a local fishing tournament held many years ago. All of the big name locals are present, and they are competing neck and neck for the prize. Each person has his or her secret bait, and the most successful have modern bass boats, high-end fish finders, and the best rods and reels available. By the time that the late-comer enters the fray it looks as though he is hopelessly behind. Those who are watching the tournament shrug their shoulders as the late-comer calmly puts his canoe into the water and pushes off. Some even begin to laugh when they realize that he does not even have a fishing pole. Yet the mysterious entry calmly rows out into the river and moves into an area unoccupied by other fishing boats. Then as the clock ticks down to the finish, he opens up a bag that he carried with him. To everyone’s surprise he pulls out a half-stick of dynamite. He lights it and tosses it overboard. A few moments later there is a geyser of water near the point of entry. The late comer then rows to the spot and begins to collect the fish that have now floated to the surface because they were stunned by the detonation. After the closing bell is rung, he paddles to shore and his load of fish is triple that of his next closest competitor and sets a new tournament record. There are shouts of protest, but it is found that this technique was not against the rules. It was simply a game changer. In our text for today, Jesus likewise challenges foundational assumptions about the nature and meaning of resurrection.

Jesus is confronted by a group of Sadducees who attempt to trip him up with a question related to marriage and the resurrection. On the surface, Jesus’ conversation with the Sadducees may seem non-confrontational, but Luke 20 records several challenges that Jesus receives from the religious leaders of his day. Moreover, the Sadducees as a group were well known for their denial of the resurrection. This was a point of contrast between the Sadducees and Pharisees. In other words, the very fact that the Sadducees ask Jesus about life in the resurrection suggests that there is an agenda behind their question other than mere interest.

They offer Jesus a scenario in which a woman ends up married to seven brothers each of which dies and is replaced by the next brother in faithful fulfillment of the levirate marriage law from the Old Testament. This law obligated a brother to marry his sister-in-law in the event that his brother died before producing children. The firstborn child of the new union would then be considered the offspring of the deceased brother. The Sadducees then ask Jesus, “In the resurrection, therefore, whose wife will the woman be? For the seven had married her.”

Our Worthiness of Resurrection Life
The Sadducees must have believed that they had handed Jesus an unsolvable Gordian knot. For the Sadducees, the very idea of the necessity of Levirate marriage was proof that there was no resurrection. For them, a person lived on only through his or her offspring so Levirate marriage provided a means of a childless male to have offspring “from the grave.” But as Jesus often did, he adroitly side-stepped his way out of the apparent trap and used the question as an opportunity explode the status quo assumptions of the Sadducees and to point all within ear shot to the deeper reality of God’s kingdom. In other words, Jesus demonstrates the irrelevancy of the Sadducee’s scenario and pushes them to confront the truth about God’s kingdom and the resurrection.

Jesus transforms the conversation away from the question of marriage and focuses on the paradigm shift that occurs between this age and the coming age of God’s kingdom. Some have taken Jesus’ answer as proof that marriage relationships are not part of the afterlife. This however is not the intended teaching of the passage. Rather Jesus focuses on the profound contrast between an existence focused solely on one’s current life and one that is shaped by the future life of the resurrection. Notice that Jesus uses the language of “those who belong to this age” and “those who are considered worthy of a place in that age and in the resurrection” (italics added).

Through his use of the language of worthy, Jesus invites all of his hearers including us to ask ourselves, “What makes a person worthy of life in God’s coming future of resurrection?” Jesus does not directly answer this question for us in this context, but if we have been careful readers of Luke’s Gospel, there have been several recurring themes that serve as markers to this life.

Whereas Jesus offered several scathing rebukes of life in this age as “faithless and perverse” , Jesus’ stories consistently portray a different mode of existence for those who will embody the way of Jesus. In Jesus’ teaching in Luke’s Gospel, we encounter exhortations to eat and associate with “sinners” for sake of extending God’s grace to them. We discover that we are to live by an expanded definition of love for neighbor and recognize that our sworn enemies may in fact embody this ethic better than we. We are exhorted to love others and show mercy extravagantly and indiscriminately. In short, the way of Jesus turns cultural assumptions upside down and overturns tendencies to exclude from access to God those on the peripheries and margins of society.

Jesus’ use of worthy was a subtle critique of the exclusivity of the Sadducees who were drawn primarily from the upper classes of society and who were ultimately the persons most invested in the status quo because they had the most at stake in the world as it currently operated. Their primary interest was in maintaining their own privileged position in society.

The initial part of Jesus’ response is clear: the Resurrection is real and each of us needs to be ready to enter into to it. It is not about marrying and being given in marriage – it is about being a child of the resurrection.

Interpreting Scripture
But Jesus is not finished. He pushes the envelope with the Sadducees by citing Moses. The Sadducees prided themselves on their conservative approach to Scripture. They believed a doctrine only if it was rooted in the text, and for the Sadducees, only the Law of Moses, Genesis – Deuteronomy was recognized as authoritative Scripture for life. Their rejection of the resurrection was based in their insistence that Moses had written nothing about resurrection. Yet in verses 37-38, Jesus introduces the conversation between God and Moses at the burning bush on Mount Sinai as proof that Moses believed in the resurrection. Jesus paraphrases Exodus 3:8 “I am the God of your father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.” By speaking of his relationship in the present tense, Jesus suggests that God’s words imply an on-going, beyond the grave relationship between God and Israel’s ancestors.

Jesus’ words are bold and daring. He has challenged the Sadducees on their misunderstanding of the nature of resurrection and invited them to reflect on the character of their own lives. Now he clearly suggests that they do not even understand their own Scriptures!

The Game Changer
This text is subversive and deeply unsettling. As we reflect on our lives today, do not we find ourselves occupied primarily by the “busy-ness” of the world in which we live? Are not our lives more about “marrying and being given in marriage” than about learning to reflect, cultivate, and embody the sort of existence that bears witness to the reality of resurrection? Moreover our communities of faith and our homes overflow with copies of the Bible. We hear the Scriptures read and proclaimed from our pulpits. We pour over texts in daily devotional times. We engage the Bible in our conversations with one another. This text challenges us to consider the real possibility that we may be misreading the Scriptures as a means of squelching the new work that God is seeking to do in our midst.

Jesus was a game changer. His life, death, and resurrection have changed everything. Are we willing to realign continually ourselves and our communities in order to reflect the game-changing life that God offers to those who follow Jesus?

Conversations in the Valley: Life that Demands Explanation (1 Samuel 17)

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

I preached in Chapel on the Orlando campus of Asbury Theological Seminary today.

Here is a link to the Audio. Select my sermon from March 18 “Conversations in the Valley”.

If you are interested, here are some notes that I put together in preparation. The notes are not comprehensive of the content of the message but give some hints.

Conversations in the Valley: A Life that Demands Explanation
1 Samuel 17 records the familiar narrative of David slaying Goliath with a sling and a rock. This story enters our cultural lexicon as a classic underdog tale. But there is much more to this story. At its heart, it is missional. God is at work in Israel, and David steps into a moment that intersects with God’s work in the world.

This story is also full of irony and contrast. David the youngest son of Jesse slays the giant and is propelled toward a future that includes serving as king of Israel. On the other hand, the powerful and known at the time–the army and King Saul shirk responsibility and are debilitated by fear of Goliath.
Who was Goliath? He was a fearsome warrior of uncommon size. He dwarfed normal men. The very weapons that he deployed were massive and formidable. His body armor alone weighed 125 lbs. His spearhead was 15 lbs. This monster of a champion stood between Israel and victory.

Why did David volunteer to fight the giant when other more experienced warriors including his own brothers did not? As we answer this question, we can gain valuable insight into what a life that demands explanation looks like…

1) David Acts because He understands the True Problem
“Who is this uncircumcised Philistine that he should defy the armies of the living God?” (v. 26) also vv. 36 and 45
David recognized the problem for what it truly represented. It was not about Goliath, the Philistines, Israel, or even victory. The issue was God. Israel was God’s people through whom God desired to bless the nations (Gen 12:3; Exod 19:4-6). David stepped into the moment because he sensed that God’s mission was at stake.

2) David Acts Despite Questions of Motive
David receives a less than hospitable welcome from his own brothers.
Eliab: “Why have you come down here? And with whom did you leave those few sheep in the desert? I know how conceited you are and how wicked your heart is; you came down only to watch the battle? (17:28)
David was accused of impure motives by his own brothers. Notice the phrase “how wicked your heart is.” “Heart” points to the center of one’s volition. This language is vital because it resonates with language that we have encountered earlier in 1 Samuel:
“the LORD has sought out a man after his own heart” 1 Sam 13:14
1 Samuel 12:24 But be sure to fear the LORD and serve him faithfully with all your heart;
Man looks at the outward appearance, but the LORD looks at the heart.” 16:7
God is very concerned with one’s intentions. David has been approved by God as a “man after his own heart.” David can move through the accusations of others because he has already passed muster with the only personal being who matters: God.
Whom do we allow to paralyze us with questions of motive? Are we secure in our calling from God?

3) David Acts Despite the Expressed Doubts of Others
Saul is incredulous at David’s offer to fight.
32 David said to Saul, “Let no one lose heart on account of this Philistine; your servant will go and fight him.”?33 Saul replied, “You are not able to go out against this Philistine and fight him; you are only a boy, and he has been a fighting man from his youth.”?34 But David said to Saul, “Your servant has been keeping his father’s sheep. When a lion or a bear came and carried off a sheep from the flock,?35 I went after it, struck it and rescued the sheep from its mouth. When it turned on me, I seized it by its hair, struck it and killed it.?36 Your servant has killed both the lion and the bear; this uncircumcised Philistine will be like one of them, because he has defied the armies of the living God.
David is able to move forward on his mission because he recognizes that he is acting on behalf of God. Yes, he is only a boy. Yes, Goliath has been a warrior from his youth. None of these matters. David is a man on a mission.
Whose doubts are paralyzing you?

4) David Acts Out of a Life of faithfulness
David had been a shepherd for all his life. This was not glamorous work. He was the youngest of Jesse’s sons. While his brothers were off at war, he was keeping sheep. But David was already preparing for a future because he was faithful as a shepherd. He had already learned about risk and danger by confronting and killing a bear and lion that had threatened his flock. These were extraordinary acts because they demonstrated the depths of David’s faithfulness in small matters. Why risk one’s neck for a sheep? Yet David did and these actions prepared him for his day with Goliath.
Are we faithful in small things? Do we see our lives as preparation for God’s future or do we lament our own lack of opportunities?

5) David Acts for the Mission of God
Goliath thinks that he is merely fighting another battle. In fact, he is underwhelmed by the site of David.
43 He said to David, “Am I a dog, that you come at me with sticks?” And the Philistine cursed David by his gods.?44 “Come here,” he said, “and I’ll give your flesh to the birds of the air and the beasts of the field!”?45 David said to the Philistine, “You come against me with sword and spear and javelin, but I come against you in the name of the LORD Almighty, the God of the armies of Israel, whom you have defied.?46 This day the LORD will hand you over to me, and I’ll strike you down and cut off your head. Today I will give the carcasses of the Philistine army to the birds of the air and the beasts of the earth, and the whole world will know that there is a God in Israel.?47 All those gathered here will know that it is not by sword or spear that the LORD saves; for the battle is the LORD’s, and he will give all of you into our hands.”
David on the other hand frames the insuing battle in terms of God’s mission. It is not about David and Goliath. It is about the whole world knowing that there is a God in Israel. Living a life that demands explanation always serves as a witness to the greatness and glory of God.

6) A Life that Demands Explanation
After killing Goliath, David was brought before Saul.
Listen carefully to Saul’s response:
Whose son are you, young man? v. 58
Saul asks a profound question. David identifies himself as the son of Jesse, but this doesn’t explain what Saul just witnessed. It was more than merely a question of genealogy. David lived a life that demanded explanation. His life pointed to God’s work in the world.
Will ours? Do our lives point to something bigger than ourselves? Do our lives incarnate for others the message and ethos of God?